Justice Department Files Motions Defending a Rule Rescinding the Regulatory Definitions of “Harm” As It Relates to the Endangered Species Act
The Justice Department’s Energy and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) yesterday filed motions for summary judgment in four cases defending challenges to a rule rescinding the regulatory definition of “harm” in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) regulations implementing the Endangered Species Act (ESA). These cases, in the Northern District of California and the...
Contenu original affiche; la traduction localisee n'est pas encore disponible.
Ce qui s'est passé
The Justice Department’s Energy and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) yesterday filed motions for summary judgment in four cases defending challenges to a rule rescinding the regulatory definition of “harm” in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) regulations implementing the Endangered Species Act (ESA). These cases, in the Northern District of California and the...
Pourquoi c'est important
The decision may change compliance obligations, market access or operating costs for Regulation.
Entités concernées
Voir les preuves
1 articles · 1 publication d'origine · 1 independantes
- U.S. Department of JusticeSource primaire · Confirme · EN · 100%Justice Department Files Motions Defending a Rule Rescinding the Regulatory Definitions of “Harm” As It Relates to the Endangered Species Act ↗
Affirmations
- Justice Department Files Motions Defending a Rule Rescinding the Regulatory Definitions of “Harm” As It Relates to the Endangered Species Act Observé
Divergences
Aucune divergence importante détectée dans les preuves disponibles.
Chronologie
- Premier signalement
Mouvement de marché suivant l'événement
La réaction du marché n'est pas encore disponible pour cet actif et cette fenêtre.